<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Stupid Fat Face</title>
	<link>http://stupidfatface.com</link>
	<description>One Stupid Fat Face to another</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 20:29:05 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Blogger Personality</title>
		<link>http://stupidfatface.com/2007/07/25/blogger-personality/</link>
		<comments>http://stupidfatface.com/2007/07/25/blogger-personality/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 12:37:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Al</dc:creator>
		
	<category>General</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stupidfatface.com/2007/07/25/blogger-personality/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve recently been reading about MBTI and more specifically Carl Jung. It&#8217;s basically a personality profiler where you can score on a sliding scale in four areas. These being Introverted/Extroverted, Sensing/Intuition, Thinking/Feeling and Judging/Perceiving. There are four areas with two types in each area so there are 16 possible personality types. Of course, humans being [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve recently been reading about <a title="Myers-Briggs Type Indicator" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Myers-Briggs">MBTI</a> and more specifically <a title="Carl Jung" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carl_Jung">Carl Jung</a>. It&#8217;s basically a personality profiler where you can score on a sliding scale in four areas. These being Introverted/Extroverted, Sensing/Intuition, Thinking/Feeling and Judging/Perceiving. There are four areas with two types in each area so there are 16 possible personality types. Of course, humans being individual and this only being a guide you may be in the middle on some of the areas. For example, you may be a person with introverted and extroverted tendencies. I did read through all 16 personality types and try and figure out who was what but it was a lot of reading and it can be hard to judge. I found it easier looking at each area and seeing which fits best. I&#8217;ve listed them below, from this it should be quite easy to pick out which type you are but there is also a <a title="Pretty good test" href="http://www.mypersonality.info/">test</a>.<a id="more-8"></a><span id="mce_editor_0_parent" /></p>
<table>
<tr>
<td><strong>Extravert Characteristics</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Gregarious</li>
<li>Assertive</li>
<li>Talkative</li>
<li>Social/outgoing</li>
<li>Likes groups, parties, etc.</li>
<li>Energized by interaction</li>
<li>Expressive &#038; enthusiastic</li>
<li>Volunteers personal information</li>
<li>Distractable</li>
<li>Has many friends</li>
<li>Easy to approach</li>
</ul>
</td>
<td><strong>Introvert Characteristics</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Energized by time alone</li>
<li>Private</li>
<li>Keeps to self</li>
<li>Quiet</li>
<li>Deliberate</li>
<li>Internally aware</li>
<li>Fewer friends</li>
<li>Prefer smaller groups</li>
<li>Independent</li>
<li>Not socially inclined</li>
<li>Enjoys solitude</li>
<li>Thinks before speaking</li>
</ul>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Sensing Characteristics</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Concrete</li>
<li>Realistic</li>
<li>Lives in the present</li>
<li>Aware of surroundings</li>
<li>Notices details</li>
<li>Practical</li>
<li>Goes by senses</li>
<li>Factual</li>
</ul>
</td>
<td><strong>Intuitive Characteristics</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Future-focused</li>
<li>Sees possibilities</li>
<li>Inventive</li>
<li>Imaginitive</li>
<li>Deep</li>
<li>Abstract</li>
<li>Idealistic</li>
<li>Complicated</li>
<li>Theoretical</li>
</ul>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Thinking Characteristics</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Logical</li>
<li>Objective</li>
<li>Decides with head</li>
<li>Wants truth</li>
<li>Rational</li>
<li>Impersonal</li>
<li>Critical</li>
<li>Thick-skinned</li>
<li>Firm with people</li>
<li>Driven by thought</li>
</ul>
</td>
<td><strong>Feeling Characteristics</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Decides with heart</li>
<li>Dislikes conflict</li>
<li>Passionate</li>
<li>Driven by emotion</li>
<li>Gentle</li>
<li>Easily hurt</li>
<li>Empathetic</li>
<li>Caring of others</li>
<li>Warm</li>
</ul>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Judging Characteristics</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Decisive</li>
<li>Controlled</li>
<li>Good at finishing</li>
<li>Organized</li>
<li>Structured</li>
<li>Scheduled</li>
<li>Quick at tasks</li>
<li>Responsible</li>
<li>Likes closure</li>
<li>Makes plans</li>
</ul>
</td>
<td><strong>Perceiving Characteristics</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Adaptable</li>
<li>Relaxed</li>
<li>Disorganized</li>
<li>Care-free</li>
<li>Spontaneous</li>
<li>Changes tracks midway</li>
<li>Keeps options open</li>
<li>Procrastinates</li>
<li>Dislikes routine</li>
<li>Flexible</li>
</ul>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p>Whilst <a title="Stumble upon" href="http://www.stumbleupon.com">stumbling</a> I ran into a site which gives a brief description on what might be your blogging style depending on your MBTI type. I thought mine was quite accurate so I thought I&#8217;d give it ago at guessing what you guys on my blogroll are and giving you your blogger descriptions.</p>
<p><a title="Stupid Fat Face" href="http://www.stupidfatface.com">Me</a> - <a title="INTP Profile" href="http://www.mypersonality.info/personality-types/intp/">INTP</a> - As a weblogger, you might not be as concerned about popularity, but more with the ideas and theories that you strive to understand. Because routines aren&#8217;t your strong point, you might be more likely to work on the concept of how to do a blog, but not be as excited to keep it up.</p>
<p><a title="Sponsor to teach" href="http://www.sponsortoteach.com/blog">Jay</a> - <a title="ENFP Profile" href="http://www.mypersonality.info/personality-types/enfp/">ENFP</a> - As a weblogger, you may not be consistant in posts. Although, if you find a specific focus on their journal or a very flexible manner of writing, it may be more fufilling. Because you are warm and see so many posibilities in life, you may inspire others to follow in your footsteps with a journal.</p>
<p><a title="Matt Wilcox" href="http://www.mattwilcox.net/">Matt</a> - <a title="ISTP Profile" href="http://www.mypersonality.info/personality-types/istp/">ISTP</a> - Because of your desire for action and independance, you will change the format of blogging or design frequently to keep it interesting and different. Your loyalty may have you reading the same blogs over a long period of time. Even though you could be easily bored with blogging, you might find that because you like following a project through, this is a good way for you to use your alone time to sort the facts you pick up through the day.</p>
<p><a title="Sam Sinfield" href="http://www.samsinfield.net/">Sam</a> - <a title="ESTJ Profile" href="http://www.mypersonality.info/personality-types/estj/">ESTJ</a> - As a weblogger, you may fufill responsiblities as a leader in group weblogs. If you are really interested in blogging, you&#8217;ll follow it through and post regularly. Because you appreciate social order, you may be likely to take on a responsibility just to keep a project going.</p>
<p><a title="Bottled City" href="http://www.bottledcity.com/">Joel</a> - <a title="ENTP Profile" href="http://www.mypersonality.info/personality-types/entp/">ENTP</a> - As a weblogger, your love for a discussion may cause you to debate things more often. You might also flit from idea to idea, not completing one before going to the next. Your largest sense is intution, which makes you a good at understanding what is going on around you - and this could act to your benefit when making blog-like posts over a journal.</p>
<p><a title="Phil Roche" href="http://www.philroche.net/">Phil</a> - I&#8217;m not too sure on Phil. I think maybe XXTJ but I&#8217;m not sure if you are sensing or intuitive. I&#8217;m thinking probably intuitive and you also seem to display introverted and extroverted qualities. You will have to let me know.</p>
<p>Let me know what you think, take the <a title="Pretty good test" href="http://www.mypersonality.info/">test</a>, let me know what you get. I find it interesting and it will be interesting to hear what you guys think and to see how far off I am in guessing your personality types.</p>
<p>Yours,</p>
<p>Seldom posting, idea exploring Stupid Fat Face
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://stupidfatface.com/2007/07/25/blogger-personality/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thinking about replicators</title>
		<link>http://stupidfatface.com/2007/05/15/7/</link>
		<comments>http://stupidfatface.com/2007/05/15/7/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 22:09:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Al</dc:creator>
		
	<category>General</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stupidfatface.com/2007/05/15/7/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Welcome to my blog. It’s been a long time coming but I have finally made my first post. As I have waited so long to make a post I thought I’d better make it a good one. I recently bought a nice little pocket notebook to jot down thoughts that pop into my head that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal">Welcome to my blog. It’s been a long time coming but I have finally made my first post. As I have waited so long to make a post I thought I’d better make it a good one. I recently bought a nice little <a title="It worked for Hemingway and Van Gogh, perhaps it will work for me" target="_blank" href="http://www.moleskine.co.uk/">pocket notebook</a> to jot down thoughts that pop into my head that I don’t want to lose in that vast void that is my mind. I have about six ideas written down now so I had to pick one. It was a tough choice, ranging from “why, in my opinion, strange slap-stick type comedies suck” to “which power would you prefer, bending space or time?” but I picked one which I actually think is a good idea. Let’s see what you think.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><a id="more-7"></a></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong>The ultimate X Prize</strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Have you heard of the <a title="The X-Prize Foundation" target="_blank" href="http://www.xprize.org/">X-Prize</a>? It is basically a foundation setup to award monetary prizes to people/companies who solve the greatest challenges facing the world today. The last X Prize won required a non-governmental organization to launch a reusable manned spacecraft into space twice within two weeks. Impressive huh? Yeah sure, manned spacecrafts into space is all well and good but what about replicators? Yes, replicators. The ability to create any object you have the blueprint for from hydrogen atoms. I don’t actually know much about replicators, so I assume hydrogen atoms as they are the most basic. Star Trek never went into much detail.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong>Why replicators?</strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Well a replicator, in theory, will allow you to replicate any object known to man. You could replicate food, water or a solid gold diamond encrusted turd. You name it. It would solve world hunger, fresh water shortages, create expensive medicines. I’m sure most of the benefits would only come apparent when the whole world has one. I mentioned “expensive” which should ring a few bells. The amount of powerful, rich people you would upset with this kind of technology would be pretty much every powerful and rich person on this planet. There would be no need for money, no need for you to buy anything ever again. I mean if all it took was for you to select a blueprint on a computer you could download and pirate not just digital media (which has pissed <a title="The MPAA" href="http://www.mpaa.org/">a few companies</a> off already) but you could also <a title="The Pirate Bay" href="http://thepiratebay.org/">pirate</a> any object on this planet. You can imagine a situation like this:</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Jim : Hey, I like the looks of that juicy fat t-bone steak you are eating. Can I have a copy?</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Bob : Sure, I’ll stick it in an email for you.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Jim : Thanks. I also like the look of your jeans, pop that in too! Oh and your car. And that solid gold diamond encrusted turd you keep carrying around with you.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Bob : Yeah, why not.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong>What’s the point in a prize?</strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">This is where another problem comes in. Prize money is little incentive as if I just invented a replicator; a few million pounds would be of little interest. I’d just replicate me up some cash or screw cash; I’d just replicate me up anything I wanted. This is where my idea comes into play. Create a bank account which will be owned by every person on this planet. It will be a joint world account that anyone can put money into. Bank statements are publicly available via the Internet. People can donate money into the fund so that this technology can be created. They can also have the kudos of saying they helped save the world from its ills. A list can be available of people who have donated with the amount they donated. Once the replicator has been invented it then belongs to the world. This generation and every generation afterwards. Blueprints are freely available to anyone who wants it. Most people won’t be able to do anything with the blueprints as I’m sure it won’t be made out of MDF and glue but once you have one replicator you can replicate another and another. Just a matter of time before everyone has one.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong>Another problem</strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Another problem I thought of is what’s to stop a lazy sponge of a scientist to sit back and milk the X-Fund. “Yeah sure I’ll make you a replicator-dilly-thingamajig” they will say. Well, as this is a world project owned by the people of this planet, why not let them decide. Democratic voting to see who gets the X-Funding. The scientists can post their results on the web and the people can decide if they are worthy of the funding. If your research is not cutting the grade the funding stops. You can reapply but you will have to be voted in again for funding.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Having the voting on the web does exclude a few billion people on this planet but I’m sure poorer nations would love for the whole world to be on equal footing. Rich nations would no longer be rich and poor nations would no longer be poor. Poorer nations could setup public web terminals for people to vote or donate.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span />Eventually the technology would put everyone out of a job and the whole world would change fundamentally. As I said before, the implications probably won’t be realised until it happens. No more wage slavery and no more poverty. As far as I can see, people will be free to do as they please. If they want to be free creative human beings, they will be able to. If they want to sit around smoking the finest weed known to man, they will be able to. Of course this is wishful thinking and I’m sure Governments will have something to say about free individuals. There is also the problem with land (I can replicate a house but where would I put it?) and energy (perhaps replicate some solar panels) but it’s getting late and I have written far more than I expected. I&#8217;d like hear your thoughts on that matter.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Thanks for reading</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://stupidfatface.com/2007/05/15/7/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
